|
🕰️ Originally published May 15, 2017. Revisited August 2025. Back then, it was the Westfield San Francisco Centre—anchored by Nordstrom at the top, somewhere around the 5th or 7th floor. You’d ascend through its spiraling escalators, each level revealing a new vantage, a new temptation. The building felt like a vertical promenade: concentric balconies curving around a central atrium, light cascading from the dome above. Floor by floor, you rose—until finally, Nordstrom. A cathedral of commerce perched at the summit. Outside, Market Street pulsed with life. It was lunch hour—lines snaked out of every café, shoppers darted in and out of storefronts, and the sidewalks felt like arteries of a living, breathing downtown. That moment—so ordinary, so electric—inspired a simple idea: What if we gave workers two hours for lunch—not just to eat, but to participate in the city’s economy and spirit? The proposal was playful but sincere:
It was, as I wrote then, “just a thought.” But it was also a love letter to a city that thrived on foot traffic, spontaneity, and shared space. Now, in 2025, that Nordstrom is gone. Market Street feels quieter. The pandemic reshaped our rhythms. Remote work emptied offices. Retail corridors echo with vacancy. And yet—I still believe in the power of lunch. Of lingering. Of civic ritual. Let workers wander. Let them wait in line. Let them eat slowly. Let them browse shelves and sidewalks. Let them belong. Let the City invest in presence. Let lunch be long, and let the city thrive.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorCHARLES PEARSON Archives
January 2026
Categories |
RSS Feed